Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Impact of Privatization on Export in Transition Economies: A Panel Study

Year 2015, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 57 - 61, 29.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.23765

Abstract

In this study, we examine the relationship between various indicators of privatization and exports. We test the hypothesis that privatization contributes to boost exports in transition economies by exploiting a panel data set including the period 1989 to 2008 and 25 transition economies and using five privatization indicators. We identified a positive correlation between privatization and exports. This finding is statistically significant and valid for five different privatization indicators. Thus, the results suggest that privatization stimulates exports in transition economies, controlling for other factors that may contribute to increase in exports.

References

  • Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J.B. (2004). Why Some Firms Export. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 561-69.
  • Filatotchev, I., Dyomina, N., Wright, M., Buck, T. (2001). E ects of Post-Privatization Governance and Strategies on Export Intensity in the Former Soviet Union. Journal of International Business Stu- dies, 32 (4), 853-871.
  • Greenaway, D., Kneller, R. (2004). Exporting and Pro- ductivity in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20, 358-71.
  • Krugman, P. (1995). Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.1, 327-43.
  • Todo, Y., Inui, Y. , Yuan, Y. (2012). E ects of Privati- zation on Exporting Decisions: Firm-Level Eviden- ce from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-E-015. Retrieved from http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/
  • UNCTAD (2005). Developing Countries in Interna- tional Trade 2005 Trade and Development Index. NewYork: United Nations.
Year 2015, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 57 - 61, 29.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.23765

Abstract

References

  • Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J.B. (2004). Why Some Firms Export. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 561-69.
  • Filatotchev, I., Dyomina, N., Wright, M., Buck, T. (2001). E ects of Post-Privatization Governance and Strategies on Export Intensity in the Former Soviet Union. Journal of International Business Stu- dies, 32 (4), 853-871.
  • Greenaway, D., Kneller, R. (2004). Exporting and Pro- ductivity in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20, 358-71.
  • Krugman, P. (1995). Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.1, 327-43.
  • Todo, Y., Inui, Y. , Yuan, Y. (2012). E ects of Privati- zation on Exporting Decisions: Firm-Level Eviden- ce from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-E-015. Retrieved from http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/
  • UNCTAD (2005). Developing Countries in Interna- tional Trade 2005 Trade and Development Index. NewYork: United Nations.
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Jülide Yalçınkaya Koyuncu

Rasim Yılmaz

Publication Date June 29, 2015
Submission Date January 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 15 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yalçınkaya Koyuncu, J., & Yılmaz, R. (2015). The Impact of Privatization on Export in Transition Economies: A Panel Study. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.23765

20489

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.