Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bibliometric analysis of research on digital transformation and education

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 4 - ICETOL 2023 Special Issue, 1078 - 1095, 31.12.2023

Adem Özdemir Ali Tekin Yağız Saraçoğlu

https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1331297

Abstract

Recent technological developments have brought about innovations in many fields, such as education, health, economy, and finance. One of these innovations is the concept of digital transformation, which changes the way businesses, institutions, and organizations do business. The concept of digital transformation began with the Fourth Industrial Revolution and brought new technologies to it. The emergence of digital technologies has revolutionized various aspects of society, including education. Digital transformation has emerged as a powerful catalyst that reshapes traditional educational practices and offers new opportunities for teaching and learning. In particular, with the Covid-19 pandemic affecting the whole world, online education has become very important, and all educational institutions have started to integrate their systems into this change. In addition, with the philosophy of lifelong learning, it has become very easy to access training on digital platforms. In line with this information, this study aims to reveal the developments in the historical process of digital transformation and education between 2000 and 2023 in the Web of Science database and to carry out bibliometric analysis by scanning the articles and books published to determine the most studied topics in the field. To achieve the aim of the study, the keywords “digital transformation and education” were scanned. As a result of this search, 2,739 publications were published. These publications were analyzed according to year, research area, country-based distribution, subject distribution, and the most used keywords. As a result of the research, when the research areas of the articles are examined, it is seen that the most studied area is "Education and educational research" and "business". This situation can be said that digital transformation is a very remarkable subject in the field of education and business. When we look at the distribution according to years, it is clear that the greatest acceleration occurred in the last five years. This shows that digital transformation has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. In terms of countries, the subject is studied more in countries such as Germany, Spain, the United States, and Russia.

Keywords

Digital Digital Transformation Education Higher Education

References

  • AbuShanab, S., Winzker, M., Brück, R., & Schwandt, A. (2018). A study of integrating remote laboratory and on-site laboratory for low-power education. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 405-414). IEEE.
  • Alakoç, Z. (2003). Matematik ögretiminde teknolojik modern ögretim yaklasimlari. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1).
  • Asmussen, K. J., & Creswell, J. W. (1995). Campus response to a student gunman. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 575-591.
  • Ataş, H., & Gündüz, S. (2019). Yükseköğretimde Dijital Dönüşüm. (Ed: Çelik, İ.E.) Dijital Dönüşüm Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Boyutuyla. Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. Open University Press, 1900 Frost Rd., Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007.
  • Bates, A. (1997). What kind of university? Restructuring the university for technological change. London: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Website.
  • Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1964). The Affective Domain & the Cognitive Domain. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2.
  • Bogdandy, B., Tamas, J., & Toth, Z. (2020, September). Digital transformation in education during COVID-19: A case study. In 2020 11th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CoginfoCom) (pp. 000173-000178). IEEE.
  • Bonfour, A. (2016). Digital futures, digital transformation from lean production to acceluction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23279-9
  • Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N.B., Liman Kaban, A., Taşçı, G. ve Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 7(2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584.
  • Brooks, D. C., & McCormack, M. (2020). Driving Digital Transformation in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE. https://e-learning-teleformacion.blogspot.com/2020/06/driving-digitaltransformation-in.html
  • CBDDO, 2023. Cumhurbalkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi. Dijital dönüşüm nedir? https://cbddo.gov.tr/dijital-donusum/ (Access Date: 08.07.2023).
  • Chen, C. (2014). The citespace manual. College of Computing and Informatics, 1(1), 1-84.
  • Chirikov, I., Semenova, T., Maloshonok, N., Bettinger, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2020). Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost. Science advances, 6(15), eaay5324.
  • Crosier, D., & Parveva, T. (2013). The Bologna process: Its impact in Europe and beyond. Unesco.
  • Damary, R., Markova, T., & Pryadilina, N. (2017). Key challenges of on-line education in multi-cultural context. Procedia, Social and Behavioural Sciences, 237, 83-89. http://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.034
  • Davidson, C. N. ve Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. MIT Press.
  • De La Torre, L., Neustock, L. T., Herring, G. K., Chacon, J., Clemente, F. J. G., & Hesselink, L. (2020). Automatic generation and easy deployment of digitized laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(12), 7328-7337.
  • Driscoll, M., & Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced web-based training strategies: Unlocking instructionally sound online learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today 8(6).
  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. Advances in research on networked learning, 1-9.
  • Gümüşoğlu, E. K. (2017). Yükseköğretimde dijital dönüşüm. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 30-42.
  • Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2016). The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation. In ICIS 2016 Proceedings (pp. 1–20).
  • Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of education 3.0 and 4.0. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 19-31.
  • Horton, W. (2000). Designing Web-Based Training. How to teach anyone anything anywhere anytime. William Horton Consultign, Inc. USA BUL.
  • Hunsinger, J. (2019). Blended Learning. Curriculum & Instruction, Instructional Technology, K-12 Teachers, Professional Development for Teachers, Resources, Teacher Tips. Jul 30,2019.
  • IBM Institute for Business Value, 2019. Digital transformation: Creating new business models where digital meets physical. Retrieved from https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/itworldcanada/archive/Themes/Hubs/Brainstorm/digital-transformation.pdf
  • Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International journal of information management, 55, 102183.
  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., ... & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
  • Johnson, B. G., Phillips, F., & Chase, L. G. (2009). An intelligent tutoring system for the accounting cycle: Enhancing textbook homework with artificial intelligence. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(1), 30–39.
  • Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14(1-25).
  • Kelly, D. (2008). Adaptive versus learner control in a multiple intelligence learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 17(3), 307–336.
  • Kerr, P. (2016). Adaptive learning. ELT Journal, 70(1), 88–93.
  • Kömür, İ. A., Kılınç, H., & Okur, M. R. (2023). The Rotation Model in Blended Learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  • Machado, G. S., Silva, Y. M. L. R., & de Lucena, V. F. (2018). A tool for the automatic selection of mechatronics remote laboratories based on their actual effective costs. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  • Maiti, A., Zutin, D. G., Wuttke, H. D., Henke, K., Maxwell, A. D., & Kist, A. A. (2017). A framework for analyzing and evaluating architectures and control strategies in distributed remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(4), 441-455.
  • Maroquin, W. G., Fernandez, M., & Avila, W. M. (2016). The joint training, a SENA learning model for latin america. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(6), 2997-3002.
  • MDPI, 2023. Sustainability journals. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability (Access Date: 012.07.2023).
  • Nolen, S. B., & Koretsky, M. D. (2018). Affordances of virtual and physical laboratory projects for instructional design: Impacts on student engagement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(3), 226-233.
  • Nurhas, I., Aditya, B. R., Jacob, D. W., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2022). Understanding the challenges of rapid digital transformation: the case of COVID-19 pandemic in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(13), 2924-2940.
  • Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227- 233.
  • Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2018, September). Digital Transformation: Drivers, success factors, and implications. In MCIS (p. 37).
  • Özdemir A., Tan F., Z. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on organizational agility. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Öztemel, E. (2018). Eğitimde yeni yönelimlerin değerlendirilmesi ve eğitim 4.0. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 25-30.
  • Palmer, S. R. (2011). The lived experience of flexible education–theory, policy and practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(3), 2.
  • Pooworavan, Y. (2015). Challenges of new frontier in learning: Education 4.0. Bangkok: Innovative Learning Center.
  • Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(5), 92-97.
  • Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018, March). Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In World Conference on Information Systems And Technologies (pp. 411-421). Springer.
  • Rosík, M. (2017, October). Education 4.0: Is there a synergy between Industry 4.0 and Education. In International Workshop on Knowledge Management, IWKM ‘2017 (Vol. 12, p. 13).
  • Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. Higher Education Academy.
  • Schallmo, D. R., & Williams, C. A. (2018). History of digital transformation. In Digital Transformation Now (pp. 3-8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72844-5_2
  • Schauer, F., Krbecek, M., Beno, P., Gerza, M., Palka, L., & Spilaková, P. (2015, February). REMLABNET II-open remote laboratory management system for university and secondary schools research based teaching. In Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) (pp. 109-112). IEEE. Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of educational technology & society, 15(3), 3-26.
  • Somyürek, S. (2015). The new trends in adaptive educational hypermedia systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 221–241.
  • Stolterman, E., & Fors, A. C. (2004). Information technology and the good life. In Information systems Research (pp. 687-692). Springer.
  • Taşçı, G., & Çelebi, M. (2020). Eğitimde yeni bir paradigma: “Yükseköğretimde yapay zeka”. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(29), 2346-2370. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.747634
  • Taşkıran, A. (2017). Dijital çağda yükseköğretim. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 96–109.
  • Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
  • Uğur, B. (2007). Öğrencilerin karma öğrenme yöntemine ve yöntemin uygulanmasına yönelik görüşlerinin başarı, cinsiyet ve öğrenme stilleri açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Expanding evidence approaches for learning in a digital world. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
  • Wallner, T., Wagner, G., Costa, Y. J., Pell, A., Lengauer, E., & Halmerbauer, G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. In International Conference on Education and New Developments (Vol. 2016, pp. 155-159). Lisbon, Portugal: World Institute for Advanced Research and Science.

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 4 - ICETOL 2023 Special Issue, 1078 - 1095, 31.12.2023

Adem Özdemir Ali Tekin Yağız Saraçoğlu

https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1331297

Abstract

References

  • AbuShanab, S., Winzker, M., Brück, R., & Schwandt, A. (2018). A study of integrating remote laboratory and on-site laboratory for low-power education. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 405-414). IEEE.
  • Alakoç, Z. (2003). Matematik ögretiminde teknolojik modern ögretim yaklasimlari. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1).
  • Asmussen, K. J., & Creswell, J. W. (1995). Campus response to a student gunman. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 575-591.
  • Ataş, H., & Gündüz, S. (2019). Yükseköğretimde Dijital Dönüşüm. (Ed: Çelik, İ.E.) Dijital Dönüşüm Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Boyutuyla. Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. Open University Press, 1900 Frost Rd., Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007.
  • Bates, A. (1997). What kind of university? Restructuring the university for technological change. London: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Website.
  • Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1964). The Affective Domain & the Cognitive Domain. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2.
  • Bogdandy, B., Tamas, J., & Toth, Z. (2020, September). Digital transformation in education during COVID-19: A case study. In 2020 11th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CoginfoCom) (pp. 000173-000178). IEEE.
  • Bonfour, A. (2016). Digital futures, digital transformation from lean production to acceluction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23279-9
  • Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N.B., Liman Kaban, A., Taşçı, G. ve Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 7(2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584.
  • Brooks, D. C., & McCormack, M. (2020). Driving Digital Transformation in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE. https://e-learning-teleformacion.blogspot.com/2020/06/driving-digitaltransformation-in.html
  • CBDDO, 2023. Cumhurbalkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi. Dijital dönüşüm nedir? https://cbddo.gov.tr/dijital-donusum/ (Access Date: 08.07.2023).
  • Chen, C. (2014). The citespace manual. College of Computing and Informatics, 1(1), 1-84.
  • Chirikov, I., Semenova, T., Maloshonok, N., Bettinger, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2020). Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost. Science advances, 6(15), eaay5324.
  • Crosier, D., & Parveva, T. (2013). The Bologna process: Its impact in Europe and beyond. Unesco.
  • Damary, R., Markova, T., & Pryadilina, N. (2017). Key challenges of on-line education in multi-cultural context. Procedia, Social and Behavioural Sciences, 237, 83-89. http://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.034
  • Davidson, C. N. ve Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The future of learning institutions in a digital age. MIT Press.
  • De La Torre, L., Neustock, L. T., Herring, G. K., Chacon, J., Clemente, F. J. G., & Hesselink, L. (2020). Automatic generation and easy deployment of digitized laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(12), 7328-7337.
  • Driscoll, M., & Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced web-based training strategies: Unlocking instructionally sound online learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today 8(6).
  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. Advances in research on networked learning, 1-9.
  • Gümüşoğlu, E. K. (2017). Yükseköğretimde dijital dönüşüm. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 30-42.
  • Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2016). The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation. In ICIS 2016 Proceedings (pp. 1–20).
  • Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of education 3.0 and 4.0. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 19-31.
  • Horton, W. (2000). Designing Web-Based Training. How to teach anyone anything anywhere anytime. William Horton Consultign, Inc. USA BUL.
  • Hunsinger, J. (2019). Blended Learning. Curriculum & Instruction, Instructional Technology, K-12 Teachers, Professional Development for Teachers, Resources, Teacher Tips. Jul 30,2019.
  • IBM Institute for Business Value, 2019. Digital transformation: Creating new business models where digital meets physical. Retrieved from https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/itworldcanada/archive/Themes/Hubs/Brainstorm/digital-transformation.pdf
  • Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International journal of information management, 55, 102183.
  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., ... & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
  • Johnson, B. G., Phillips, F., & Chase, L. G. (2009). An intelligent tutoring system for the accounting cycle: Enhancing textbook homework with artificial intelligence. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(1), 30–39.
  • Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14(1-25).
  • Kelly, D. (2008). Adaptive versus learner control in a multiple intelligence learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 17(3), 307–336.
  • Kerr, P. (2016). Adaptive learning. ELT Journal, 70(1), 88–93.
  • Kömür, İ. A., Kılınç, H., & Okur, M. R. (2023). The Rotation Model in Blended Learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  • Machado, G. S., Silva, Y. M. L. R., & de Lucena, V. F. (2018). A tool for the automatic selection of mechatronics remote laboratories based on their actual effective costs. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  • Maiti, A., Zutin, D. G., Wuttke, H. D., Henke, K., Maxwell, A. D., & Kist, A. A. (2017). A framework for analyzing and evaluating architectures and control strategies in distributed remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(4), 441-455.
  • Maroquin, W. G., Fernandez, M., & Avila, W. M. (2016). The joint training, a SENA learning model for latin america. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(6), 2997-3002.
  • MDPI, 2023. Sustainability journals. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability (Access Date: 012.07.2023).
  • Nolen, S. B., & Koretsky, M. D. (2018). Affordances of virtual and physical laboratory projects for instructional design: Impacts on student engagement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(3), 226-233.
  • Nurhas, I., Aditya, B. R., Jacob, D. W., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2022). Understanding the challenges of rapid digital transformation: the case of COVID-19 pandemic in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(13), 2924-2940.
  • Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227- 233.
  • Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2018, September). Digital Transformation: Drivers, success factors, and implications. In MCIS (p. 37).
  • Özdemir A., Tan F., Z. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on organizational agility. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Öztemel, E. (2018). Eğitimde yeni yönelimlerin değerlendirilmesi ve eğitim 4.0. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 25-30.
  • Palmer, S. R. (2011). The lived experience of flexible education–theory, policy and practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(3), 2.
  • Pooworavan, Y. (2015). Challenges of new frontier in learning: Education 4.0. Bangkok: Innovative Learning Center.
  • Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(5), 92-97.
  • Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018, March). Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In World Conference on Information Systems And Technologies (pp. 411-421). Springer.
  • Rosík, M. (2017, October). Education 4.0: Is there a synergy between Industry 4.0 and Education. In International Workshop on Knowledge Management, IWKM ‘2017 (Vol. 12, p. 13).
  • Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. Higher Education Academy.
  • Schallmo, D. R., & Williams, C. A. (2018). History of digital transformation. In Digital Transformation Now (pp. 3-8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72844-5_2
  • Schauer, F., Krbecek, M., Beno, P., Gerza, M., Palka, L., & Spilaková, P. (2015, February). REMLABNET II-open remote laboratory management system for university and secondary schools research based teaching. In Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) (pp. 109-112). IEEE. Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of educational technology & society, 15(3), 3-26.
  • Somyürek, S. (2015). The new trends in adaptive educational hypermedia systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 221–241.
  • Stolterman, E., & Fors, A. C. (2004). Information technology and the good life. In Information systems Research (pp. 687-692). Springer.
  • Taşçı, G., & Çelebi, M. (2020). Eğitimde yeni bir paradigma: “Yükseköğretimde yapay zeka”. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(29), 2346-2370. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.747634
  • Taşkıran, A. (2017). Dijital çağda yükseköğretim. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 96–109.
  • Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
  • Uğur, B. (2007). Öğrencilerin karma öğrenme yöntemine ve yöntemin uygulanmasına yönelik görüşlerinin başarı, cinsiyet ve öğrenme stilleri açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Expanding evidence approaches for learning in a digital world. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
  • Wallner, T., Wagner, G., Costa, Y. J., Pell, A., Lengauer, E., & Halmerbauer, G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. In International Conference on Education and New Developments (Vol. 2016, pp. 155-159). Lisbon, Portugal: World Institute for Advanced Research and Science.
There are 63 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Instructional Technologies
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Adem Özdemir 0000-0003-3127-6846

Ali Tekin 0000-0003-4029-5424

Yağız Saraçoğlu 0000-0002-3098-9468

Publication Date December 31, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 4 - ICETOL 2023 Special Issue

Cite

APA Özdemir, A., Tekin, A., & Saraçoğlu, Y. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on digital transformation and education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 1078-1095. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1331297
 Download Cover Image


22029

JETOL is abstracted and indexed by ERIC - Education Resources Information Center.