Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL ASSET CHOICE

Year 2024, Issue: 43, 91 - 108, 05.05.2024

Behice Canatan Gökhan Özbilge Egemen İpek

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1416671

Abstract

This study investigates the possible effects of social factors and attitudes towards risk, including financial specialists, media, politicians, religious/spiritual opinion leaders, and business circles, on individuals' preferences for selected traditional, risky, and innovative financial assets. The concrete outputs of the study obtained with the help of the logit model are based on the micro data set of the 2019 Household Financial Perception and Attitude Survey published by the Finance Office of the Presidency of Türkiye. The findings confirm that increases in individuals' attitudes towards risk will increase the probability of choosing risky and innovative assets and diversified portfolio compositions with these assets. On the other hand, individuals' financial asset choices are significantly influenced by social/environmental factors. More strikingly, it should be emphasized that among these factors, the positive effects of financial professionals are lower than those of the business environment, religious/spiritual opinion leaders, and the media. It is essential to carefully monitor the effects of media and religious/opinion leaders, especially when shifting to riskier assets and their combinations in terms of financial assets, in order to formulate policy recommendations.

Keywords

Household Financial Assets Choice Attitude Towards Risk Social Background Logit

References

  • Kaynakça Ahmad, S. (2017). Factors Influencing Individual Investors’ Behavior: An Empirical Study of Pakistan Financial Markets. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 4(6), 1-8.
  • Akhter, T., ve Hoque, M. E. (2022). Moderating Effects of Financial Cognitive Abilities and Considerations on the Attitude–Intentions Nexus of Stock Market Participation. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(1), 5.
  • Akyıldırım, E. , Güneş, H. ve Çelik, İ. (2022). Türkiye’de Finansal Varlıklar Arasında Dinamik Bağlantılılık: TVP-VAR Modelinden Kanıtlar. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 8 (2) , 346-363.
  • Alagidede, P., ve Panagiotidis, T. (2010). Can Common Stocks Provide a Hedge against Inflation? Evidence From African Countries. Review of Financial Economics, 19(3), 91-100.
  • Almeida, J., ve Gonçalves, T. C. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Volatility and Risk Management on Cryptocurrency Investment: A Methodological Point of View. Risks, 10(5), 107.
  • Al-Nassar, N. S., ve Bhatti, R. H. (2019). Are Common Stocks a Hedge Against Inflation in Emerging Markets? Journal of Economics and Finance, 43, 421-455.
  • Alonso, S. L. N., Jorge-Vázquez, J., Rodríguez, P. A., ve Hernández, B. M. S. (2023). Gender Gap in The Ownership and Use of Cryptocurrencies: Empirical Evidence from Spain. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100103.
  • Arias-Oliva, M., de Andrés-Sánchez, J., ve Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2021). Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing The Use of Cryptocurrencies in Spanish Households. Mathematics, 9(4), 324.
  • Bao, H., Wu, X., Peng, Y., ve Han, L. (2022). Key Factors Influencing Household Asset Allocation of Relocated Households: A Case Study of Hangzhou. Habitat International, 124, 102562.
  • Baur, D. G., Hong, K., ve Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of Exchange or Speculative Assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189.
  • Bayrakdaroğlu, A., ve Şan, F. B. (2015). Bireylerin Hisse Senedi Piyasasına Katılım Eğilimlerine Etki Eden Ekonomik Olmayan Faktörler Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 507-530.
  • Bayyurt, N., Karışık, V., ve Coşkun, A. (2013). Gender Differences in Investment Preferences. European Journal of Economic & Political Studies, 6(1), 71-83.
  • Benny, V. (2014). Investment Attitude in Gold-An Investors Perspective. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),19(12), 32-36.
  • Bonaparte, Y. (2022). Time Horizon and Cryptocurrency Ownership: Is crypto not Speculative? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 79, 101609.
  • Botte, A., ve Nigro, M. (2021). Risk Analysis of Crypto Assets. TwoSigma, July.
  • Bouri, E., Gupta, R., ve Roubaud, D. (2019). Herding Behaviour in Cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 29, 216-221.
  • Boztosun, D., ve Keskin, O. (2022). Türkiye’de Kripto Para Birimlerinin Bilinirliği, Kullanımı ve Gelecek Beklentileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 2354-2367.
  • Brounen, D., Koedijk, K. G., ve Pownall, R. A. (2016). Household Financial Planning and Savings Behavior. Journal of International Money and Finance, 69, 95-107.
  • Cardak, B. A., ve Wilkins, R. (2009). The Determinants of Household Risky Asset Holdings: Australian Evidence on Background Risk and other Factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), 850-860.
  • Celse, J., Karakostas, A., ve Zizzo, D. J. (2023). Relative Risk Taking and Social Curiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 210, 243-264.
  • Changwony, F. K., Campbell, K., ve Tabner, I. T. (2015). Social Engagement and Stock Market Participation. Review of Finance, 19(1), 317-366.
  • Changwony, F. K., Campbell, K., ve Tabner, I. T. (2021). Savings Goals and Wealth Allocation in Household Financial Portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 124, 106028.
  • Cihangir, M., Baysa, E., Söker, F. ve Eroğlu, S. E. (2019). Bitcoin Piyasasına Katılım Eğilimi: Farklı Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Ankete Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme. Avrasya Sosyal Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (4), 505-522.
  • Conlon, T., Corbet, S., ve McGee, R. J. (2020). Are Cryptocurrencies a Safe Haven for Equity Markets? An international perspective from the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101248.
  • Çopur, Z., ve Gutter, M. S. (2019). Economic, Sociological, and Psychological Factors of the Saving Behavior: Turkey Case. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(2), 305-322.
  • Dağtekin, O. C. ve Toğay, S. (2020). Demografik Faktörler Özelinde Bitcoin’e Yaklaşım ve Güven Eğilimine Dair Bir İnceleme. Journal of Banking and Financial Research, 7(1), 1-8.
  • Delfabbro, P., King, D., Williams, J., ve Georgiou, N. (2021). Cryptocurrency Trading, Gambling and Problem Gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 122, 107021.
  • Demiralay, S., ve Bayracı, S. (2021). Should Stock Investors include Cryptocurrencies in their Portfolios after all? Evidence from a Conditional Diversification BenefitsMeasure. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 6188-6204.
  • Demirci, S., Güriş, S., Çinko, L., Turgut, Ü. N., ve Kızılarslan, Ş. (2022). Türkiye’de “Yastık Altı” Altın: Bir Uygulama. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, (36), 77-92.
  • Dimson, E., Marsh, P., ve Staunton, M. (2002). Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Returns. Princeton University Press.
  • Duflo, E., ve Saez, E. (2002). Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues’ Choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85(1), 121-148.
  • East, R. (1993). Investment Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 337-375.
  • Erdem, B. P. (2020). Turkiye’de Hanehalki Tasarruflarinin Belirleyicileri. Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Fagereng, A., Gottlieb, C., ve Guiso, L. (2017). Asset market participation and portfolio choice over the life‐cycle. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 705-750.
  • Ghorbel, A., ve Jeribi, A. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Volatilities of Cryptocurrencies and other Financial Assets. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 44(2), 817-843.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., ve Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the Stock Market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557-2600.
  • Gujarati, D. N. ve Porter, D. C. (2012). Temel ekonometri (Çev: Ü. Şenesen ve G.G. Şenesen). Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Hajji, M. A., Bouri, E., ve Gupta, R. (2022). The Benefits of Diversification between Bitcoin, Bonds, Equities and the US dollar: A Matter of Portfolio Construction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 39(04), 2040024.
  • Hesniati, H. (2020). Analysis of Factors Influencing Investment Decision. Journal of Global Business and Management Review, 2(1), 13-20.
  • İpek, E. (2020). The Costs of Disability in Turkey. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 41(2), 229-237.
  • İpek, E., ve Sekmen, Ö. (2016). Household Savings in Turkey: Evidence from Microdata. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 2(04), 102-108.
  • İpek, Ö. (2021). Türkiye’de Hanehalkı Portföy Tercihine Etki Eden Faktörler. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 16(64), 1575-1591.
  • Jalan, A., ve Matkovskyy, R. (2023). The Role of Trust in Crypto Investment and Savings-Evidence from Three Nordic Countries. Available at SSRN 4379913.
  • Jia, D., Li, R., Bian, S., ve Gan, C. (2021). Financial Planning Ability, Risk Perception and Household Portfolio Choice. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(8), 2153-2175.
  • Joo, S. H., ve Grable, J. E. (2001). Factors Associated with Seeking and Using Professional Retirement‐Planning Help. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 30(1), 37-63.
  • Kang, C., ve Hu, R. (2021). Age Structure of the Population and the Choice of Household Financial Assets. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 2889-2905.
  • Karabıyık, C. (2020). Türkiye’de Borsa, Emtia, Tahvil ve Döviz Piyasaları Arasındaki Etkileşim: Yayılım Endeksi Yaklaşımı. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 18(4), 265-284.
  • Kaustia, M., Conlin, A., ve Luotonen, N. (2022). What Drives Stock Market Participation? The Role of Institutional, Traditional, and Behavioral Factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, 106743.
  • Keskin, Z., ve Aste, T. (2020). Information-Theoretic Measures for Nonlinear Causality Detection: Application to Social Media Sentiment and Cryptocurrency Prices. Royal Society Open Science, 7(9), 200863.
  • Khan, S. U., Ramella, S., Rahman, H. U., ve Hyder, Z. (2022). Household Portfolio Allocations: Evidence on Risk Preferences from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey Using Tobit Models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4), 161.
  • Król, K., ve Zdonek, D. (2022). Digital Assets in the Eyes of Generation Z: Perceptions, Outlooks, Concerns. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1), 22.
  • Kyriazis, N., Papadamou, S., ve Corbet, S. (2020). A Systematic Review of The Bubble Dynamics of Cryptocurrency Prices. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101254.
  • LaValley, M. P. 2008. Logistic Regression. Circulation, 117(18), 2395-2399.
  • Lawrenson, J., ve Dickason-Koekemoer, Z. (2020). A model for female South African investors’ financial risk tolerance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1794493.
  • Li, K., Mengmeng, H., ve Huo, J. (2022). Digital Inclusive Finance and Asset Allocation of Chinese Residents: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey. Plos One, 17(5), e0267055.
  • Lu, X., Guo, J., ve Gan, L. (2020). International Comparison of Household Asset Allocation: Micro-Evidence from Cross-Country Comparisons. Emerging Markets Review, 43, 100691.
  • Madrian, B. C., ve Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401 (K) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149-1187.
  • Maghyereh, A., ve Abdoh, H. (2020). Tail dependence between Bitcoin and financial assets: Evidence from a quantile cross-spectral approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101545.
  • Mak, M. K., ve Ip, W. H. (2017). An Exploratory Study of İnvestment Behaviour of İnvestors. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 9, 1-12.
  • Muparuri, L. ve Gumbo, V. (2022). On Logit and Artificial Neural Networks in Corporate Distress Modelling for Zimbabwe Listed Corporates. Sustainability Analytics and Modeling, 100006.
  • Narinç, N. Ö. ve Küçükönder, H. (2020). Hanehalkı Tasarruf Tercihlerinin Ardışık Logit Modelle Belirlenmesi: Türkiye Örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1554-1572.
  • Nurbarani, B. S., ve Soepriyanto, G. (2022). Determinants of Investment Decision in Cryptocurrency: Evidence from Indonesian Investors. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10, 254-66.
  • Oyman, N. (2022). Dijital Gelişmeler Kapsamında Sosyo-Ekonomik Yaşam ve Din: Kripto Para Örneği. ATEBE, (7), 61-78.
  • Pastor, M. C., Almazan, D. A., Flores, L. R., Lopez, L. J., Maralit, A. P., ve Melo, M. C. (2022). Factors Affecting the Behavior of Young Professionalstowards Savings and Investment. American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), 5(5), 44-50.
  • Patil, S., ve Bagodi, V. (2021). A Study of Factors Affecting İnvestment Decisions in India: The KANO Way. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 197-214.
  • Pho, K. H., Ly, S., Lu, R., Van Hoang, T. H., ve Wong, W. K. (2021). Is Bitcoin a Better Portfolio Diversifier than Gold? A Copula and Sectoral Analysis for China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101674.
  • Pilatin, A. (2022). Bireylerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Özellikleri Kripto Varlık Satın Almalarını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye’den Kanıtlar. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 665-678.
  • Pollob I., S. A., Abedin, M. M., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. M. ve Maniruzzaman, M. (2022). Predicting Risks of Low Birth Weight in Bangladesh with Machine Learning. Plos One, 17(5), e0267190.
  • Pursiainen, V., ve Toczynski, J. (2022). Retail Investors’ Cryptocurrency Investments. Available at SSRN 4268236.
  • Rampal, P., ve Biswas, S. (2022). Socioeconomic Determinants of Household Investment Portfolio in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 21(3), 265-290.
  • Rashid, A., Bakry, W., ve Al-Mohamad, S. (2022). Are Cryptocurrencies a Future Safe Haven for Investors? The Case of Bitcoin. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 2140443.
  • Roussanov, N., ve Savor, P. (2014). Marriage and Managers’ Attitudes to Risk. Management Science, 60(10), 2496–508.
  • Rudys, V., ve Svogun, D. (2022). Optimal Cryptocurrency Portfolio Allocation over the Life Cycle. Applied Economics, 1-15.
  • Schleritzko, M. (2023). Households’ Expectations of Returns on Gold. Available at SSRN 4398358.
  • Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., ve Lucey, B. (2019). Is Bitcoin a Better Safe-Haven Investment than Gold and Commodities? International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 322-330.
  • Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M., ve Mazzara, M. (2019). A PLS-SEM Neural Network Approach for Understanding Cryptocurrency Adoption. IEEE Access, 8, 13138-13150.
  • Symitsi, E., ve Chalvatzis, K. J. (2019). The Economic Value of Bitcoin: A Portfolio Analysis of Currencies, Gold, Oil and Stocks. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 97-110.
  • Şenkardeş, C. G., ve Akadur, O. (2021). A Research on the Factors Affecting Cryptocurrency Investments within the Gender Context. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 10(4), 178-189.
  • Tuna, G., ve Tuna, V. E. (2022). Are Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Markets Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from Gold, Oil and Stock Markets. Resources Policy, 76, 102637.
  • Wen, F., Tong, X., ve Ren, X. (2022). Gold or Bitcoin, Which is the Safe Haven During the COVID-19 Pandemic?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102121.
  • West, T., ve Worthington, A. C. (2014). Macroeconomic Conditions and Australian Financial Risk Attitudes, 2001–2010. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35, 263-277.
  • Xi, D., O’Brien, T. I., ve Irannezhad, E. (2020). Investigating the Investment Behaviors in Cryptocurrency. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 23(2), 141-160.
  • Yakupoğlu, Y. A. ve Okur, M. (2021). A Study on Perception of Financial Market Professionals in Turkey towards Gold. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences , 20 (3), 1324-1337.
  • Yang, Y., Zhang, C., ve Yan, Y. (2019). Does Religious Faith Affect Household Financial Market Participation? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 83, 42-50.
  • Yeong, Y. C., Kalid, K. S., Savita, K. S., Ahmad, M. N., ve Zaffar, M. (2022). Sustainable Cryptocurrency Adoption Assessment among IT Enthusiasts and Cryptocurrency Social Communities. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102085.
  • Yıldırım, Z. ve Üçdoğruk Birecikli, Ş., (2021), Dilim Regresyon Yöntemiyle Türkiye'de Hanehalkı Tasarruf Eğilimi Araştırması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 35(2), 523-550
  • Zahirović, S., ve Okičić, J. (2016). Effects of Risk Aversion on Securities Portfolio Performance in Underdeveloped Capital Markets: The Case of the Capital Market of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 343-359.
  • Zengin, S., Yüksel, S., ve Kartal, M. T. (2018). Türkiye'deki Düşük Hanehalkı Tasarrufuna Neden Olan Faktörlerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 13(49), 86-100.
  • Zhang, A. C., Fang, J., Jacobsen, B., ve Marshall, B. R. (2018). Peer Effects, Personal Characteristics and Asset Allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 76-95.
  • Zhang, S., ve Mani, G. (2021). Popular cryptoassets (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin), Gold, and Their Relationships: Volatility and Correlation Modeling. Data Science and Management, 4, 30-39.

HANEHALKI FİNANSAL VARLIK SEÇİMİNİN SOSYAL BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Year 2024, Issue: 43, 91 - 108, 05.05.2024

Behice Canatan Gökhan Özbilge Egemen İpek

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1416671

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bireylerin finans uzmanları, medya, siyasetçiler, dini/manevi kanaat önderleri ve iş çevrelerinden oluşan sosyal faktörleri ile riske karşı tutumlarının, seçili geleneksel, riskli ve yenilikçi finansal varlık tercihleri üzerindeki muhtemel etkilerini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın Türkiye örneklemi için logit model yardımıyla elde edilen somut çıktıları, Cumhurbaşkanlığı Finans Ofisi tarafından yayınlanan 2019 yılı Hanehalkı Finansal Algı ve Tutum Araştırması mikro veri setine dayanmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, bireylerin riske karşı tutumlarında meydana gelen artışın hem riskli ve yenilikçi varlıkların hem de bu varlıklarla çeşitlendirilen portföy bileşimlerinin tercih edilme olasılığını artıracağını doğrulamaktadır. Diğer yandan bireylerin finansal varlık seçimlerinin önemli ölçüde sosyal/çevresel faktörlerden etkilendiği anlaşılmaktadır. Daha çarpıcı olarak vurgulanması gereken, bu faktörlerden finans uzmanlarının pozitif etkilerinin iş çevresi, dini/manevi kanaat önderleri ve medyanın etkilerinden daha düşük oluşudur. Özellikle finansal varlıklar açısından daha riskli varlıklara ve bunların bileşimlerine geçildiğinde artan medya ve dini/kanaat önderlerine ait etkilerin dikkatle izlenmesi konuyla ilgili oluşturulabilecek politika önerileri açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Keywords

Hanehalkı Finansal Varlık Seçimi Riske Karşı Tutum Sosyal Arka Plan Logit

References

  • Kaynakça Ahmad, S. (2017). Factors Influencing Individual Investors’ Behavior: An Empirical Study of Pakistan Financial Markets. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 4(6), 1-8.
  • Akhter, T., ve Hoque, M. E. (2022). Moderating Effects of Financial Cognitive Abilities and Considerations on the Attitude–Intentions Nexus of Stock Market Participation. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(1), 5.
  • Akyıldırım, E. , Güneş, H. ve Çelik, İ. (2022). Türkiye’de Finansal Varlıklar Arasında Dinamik Bağlantılılık: TVP-VAR Modelinden Kanıtlar. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 8 (2) , 346-363.
  • Alagidede, P., ve Panagiotidis, T. (2010). Can Common Stocks Provide a Hedge against Inflation? Evidence From African Countries. Review of Financial Economics, 19(3), 91-100.
  • Almeida, J., ve Gonçalves, T. C. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Volatility and Risk Management on Cryptocurrency Investment: A Methodological Point of View. Risks, 10(5), 107.
  • Al-Nassar, N. S., ve Bhatti, R. H. (2019). Are Common Stocks a Hedge Against Inflation in Emerging Markets? Journal of Economics and Finance, 43, 421-455.
  • Alonso, S. L. N., Jorge-Vázquez, J., Rodríguez, P. A., ve Hernández, B. M. S. (2023). Gender Gap in The Ownership and Use of Cryptocurrencies: Empirical Evidence from Spain. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100103.
  • Arias-Oliva, M., de Andrés-Sánchez, J., ve Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2021). Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing The Use of Cryptocurrencies in Spanish Households. Mathematics, 9(4), 324.
  • Bao, H., Wu, X., Peng, Y., ve Han, L. (2022). Key Factors Influencing Household Asset Allocation of Relocated Households: A Case Study of Hangzhou. Habitat International, 124, 102562.
  • Baur, D. G., Hong, K., ve Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of Exchange or Speculative Assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189.
  • Bayrakdaroğlu, A., ve Şan, F. B. (2015). Bireylerin Hisse Senedi Piyasasına Katılım Eğilimlerine Etki Eden Ekonomik Olmayan Faktörler Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 507-530.
  • Bayyurt, N., Karışık, V., ve Coşkun, A. (2013). Gender Differences in Investment Preferences. European Journal of Economic & Political Studies, 6(1), 71-83.
  • Benny, V. (2014). Investment Attitude in Gold-An Investors Perspective. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),19(12), 32-36.
  • Bonaparte, Y. (2022). Time Horizon and Cryptocurrency Ownership: Is crypto not Speculative? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 79, 101609.
  • Botte, A., ve Nigro, M. (2021). Risk Analysis of Crypto Assets. TwoSigma, July.
  • Bouri, E., Gupta, R., ve Roubaud, D. (2019). Herding Behaviour in Cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 29, 216-221.
  • Boztosun, D., ve Keskin, O. (2022). Türkiye’de Kripto Para Birimlerinin Bilinirliği, Kullanımı ve Gelecek Beklentileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 2354-2367.
  • Brounen, D., Koedijk, K. G., ve Pownall, R. A. (2016). Household Financial Planning and Savings Behavior. Journal of International Money and Finance, 69, 95-107.
  • Cardak, B. A., ve Wilkins, R. (2009). The Determinants of Household Risky Asset Holdings: Australian Evidence on Background Risk and other Factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), 850-860.
  • Celse, J., Karakostas, A., ve Zizzo, D. J. (2023). Relative Risk Taking and Social Curiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 210, 243-264.
  • Changwony, F. K., Campbell, K., ve Tabner, I. T. (2015). Social Engagement and Stock Market Participation. Review of Finance, 19(1), 317-366.
  • Changwony, F. K., Campbell, K., ve Tabner, I. T. (2021). Savings Goals and Wealth Allocation in Household Financial Portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 124, 106028.
  • Cihangir, M., Baysa, E., Söker, F. ve Eroğlu, S. E. (2019). Bitcoin Piyasasına Katılım Eğilimi: Farklı Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Ankete Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme. Avrasya Sosyal Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (4), 505-522.
  • Conlon, T., Corbet, S., ve McGee, R. J. (2020). Are Cryptocurrencies a Safe Haven for Equity Markets? An international perspective from the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101248.
  • Çopur, Z., ve Gutter, M. S. (2019). Economic, Sociological, and Psychological Factors of the Saving Behavior: Turkey Case. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(2), 305-322.
  • Dağtekin, O. C. ve Toğay, S. (2020). Demografik Faktörler Özelinde Bitcoin’e Yaklaşım ve Güven Eğilimine Dair Bir İnceleme. Journal of Banking and Financial Research, 7(1), 1-8.
  • Delfabbro, P., King, D., Williams, J., ve Georgiou, N. (2021). Cryptocurrency Trading, Gambling and Problem Gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 122, 107021.
  • Demiralay, S., ve Bayracı, S. (2021). Should Stock Investors include Cryptocurrencies in their Portfolios after all? Evidence from a Conditional Diversification BenefitsMeasure. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 6188-6204.
  • Demirci, S., Güriş, S., Çinko, L., Turgut, Ü. N., ve Kızılarslan, Ş. (2022). Türkiye’de “Yastık Altı” Altın: Bir Uygulama. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, (36), 77-92.
  • Dimson, E., Marsh, P., ve Staunton, M. (2002). Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Returns. Princeton University Press.
  • Duflo, E., ve Saez, E. (2002). Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues’ Choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85(1), 121-148.
  • East, R. (1993). Investment Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 337-375.
  • Erdem, B. P. (2020). Turkiye’de Hanehalki Tasarruflarinin Belirleyicileri. Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Fagereng, A., Gottlieb, C., ve Guiso, L. (2017). Asset market participation and portfolio choice over the life‐cycle. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 705-750.
  • Ghorbel, A., ve Jeribi, A. (2021). Investigating the Relationship Between Volatilities of Cryptocurrencies and other Financial Assets. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 44(2), 817-843.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., ve Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the Stock Market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557-2600.
  • Gujarati, D. N. ve Porter, D. C. (2012). Temel ekonometri (Çev: Ü. Şenesen ve G.G. Şenesen). Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Hajji, M. A., Bouri, E., ve Gupta, R. (2022). The Benefits of Diversification between Bitcoin, Bonds, Equities and the US dollar: A Matter of Portfolio Construction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 39(04), 2040024.
  • Hesniati, H. (2020). Analysis of Factors Influencing Investment Decision. Journal of Global Business and Management Review, 2(1), 13-20.
  • İpek, E. (2020). The Costs of Disability in Turkey. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 41(2), 229-237.
  • İpek, E., ve Sekmen, Ö. (2016). Household Savings in Turkey: Evidence from Microdata. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 2(04), 102-108.
  • İpek, Ö. (2021). Türkiye’de Hanehalkı Portföy Tercihine Etki Eden Faktörler. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 16(64), 1575-1591.
  • Jalan, A., ve Matkovskyy, R. (2023). The Role of Trust in Crypto Investment and Savings-Evidence from Three Nordic Countries. Available at SSRN 4379913.
  • Jia, D., Li, R., Bian, S., ve Gan, C. (2021). Financial Planning Ability, Risk Perception and Household Portfolio Choice. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(8), 2153-2175.
  • Joo, S. H., ve Grable, J. E. (2001). Factors Associated with Seeking and Using Professional Retirement‐Planning Help. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 30(1), 37-63.
  • Kang, C., ve Hu, R. (2021). Age Structure of the Population and the Choice of Household Financial Assets. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 2889-2905.
  • Karabıyık, C. (2020). Türkiye’de Borsa, Emtia, Tahvil ve Döviz Piyasaları Arasındaki Etkileşim: Yayılım Endeksi Yaklaşımı. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 18(4), 265-284.
  • Kaustia, M., Conlin, A., ve Luotonen, N. (2022). What Drives Stock Market Participation? The Role of Institutional, Traditional, and Behavioral Factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, 106743.
  • Keskin, Z., ve Aste, T. (2020). Information-Theoretic Measures for Nonlinear Causality Detection: Application to Social Media Sentiment and Cryptocurrency Prices. Royal Society Open Science, 7(9), 200863.
  • Khan, S. U., Ramella, S., Rahman, H. U., ve Hyder, Z. (2022). Household Portfolio Allocations: Evidence on Risk Preferences from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey Using Tobit Models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4), 161.
  • Król, K., ve Zdonek, D. (2022). Digital Assets in the Eyes of Generation Z: Perceptions, Outlooks, Concerns. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1), 22.
  • Kyriazis, N., Papadamou, S., ve Corbet, S. (2020). A Systematic Review of The Bubble Dynamics of Cryptocurrency Prices. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101254.
  • LaValley, M. P. 2008. Logistic Regression. Circulation, 117(18), 2395-2399.
  • Lawrenson, J., ve Dickason-Koekemoer, Z. (2020). A model for female South African investors’ financial risk tolerance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1794493.
  • Li, K., Mengmeng, H., ve Huo, J. (2022). Digital Inclusive Finance and Asset Allocation of Chinese Residents: Evidence from the China Household Finance Survey. Plos One, 17(5), e0267055.
  • Lu, X., Guo, J., ve Gan, L. (2020). International Comparison of Household Asset Allocation: Micro-Evidence from Cross-Country Comparisons. Emerging Markets Review, 43, 100691.
  • Madrian, B. C., ve Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401 (K) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149-1187.
  • Maghyereh, A., ve Abdoh, H. (2020). Tail dependence between Bitcoin and financial assets: Evidence from a quantile cross-spectral approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101545.
  • Mak, M. K., ve Ip, W. H. (2017). An Exploratory Study of İnvestment Behaviour of İnvestors. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 9, 1-12.
  • Muparuri, L. ve Gumbo, V. (2022). On Logit and Artificial Neural Networks in Corporate Distress Modelling for Zimbabwe Listed Corporates. Sustainability Analytics and Modeling, 100006.
  • Narinç, N. Ö. ve Küçükönder, H. (2020). Hanehalkı Tasarruf Tercihlerinin Ardışık Logit Modelle Belirlenmesi: Türkiye Örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1554-1572.
  • Nurbarani, B. S., ve Soepriyanto, G. (2022). Determinants of Investment Decision in Cryptocurrency: Evidence from Indonesian Investors. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10, 254-66.
  • Oyman, N. (2022). Dijital Gelişmeler Kapsamında Sosyo-Ekonomik Yaşam ve Din: Kripto Para Örneği. ATEBE, (7), 61-78.
  • Pastor, M. C., Almazan, D. A., Flores, L. R., Lopez, L. J., Maralit, A. P., ve Melo, M. C. (2022). Factors Affecting the Behavior of Young Professionalstowards Savings and Investment. American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), 5(5), 44-50.
  • Patil, S., ve Bagodi, V. (2021). A Study of Factors Affecting İnvestment Decisions in India: The KANO Way. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 197-214.
  • Pho, K. H., Ly, S., Lu, R., Van Hoang, T. H., ve Wong, W. K. (2021). Is Bitcoin a Better Portfolio Diversifier than Gold? A Copula and Sectoral Analysis for China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101674.
  • Pilatin, A. (2022). Bireylerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Özellikleri Kripto Varlık Satın Almalarını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye’den Kanıtlar. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 665-678.
  • Pollob I., S. A., Abedin, M. M., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. M. ve Maniruzzaman, M. (2022). Predicting Risks of Low Birth Weight in Bangladesh with Machine Learning. Plos One, 17(5), e0267190.
  • Pursiainen, V., ve Toczynski, J. (2022). Retail Investors’ Cryptocurrency Investments. Available at SSRN 4268236.
  • Rampal, P., ve Biswas, S. (2022). Socioeconomic Determinants of Household Investment Portfolio in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 21(3), 265-290.
  • Rashid, A., Bakry, W., ve Al-Mohamad, S. (2022). Are Cryptocurrencies a Future Safe Haven for Investors? The Case of Bitcoin. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 2140443.
  • Roussanov, N., ve Savor, P. (2014). Marriage and Managers’ Attitudes to Risk. Management Science, 60(10), 2496–508.
  • Rudys, V., ve Svogun, D. (2022). Optimal Cryptocurrency Portfolio Allocation over the Life Cycle. Applied Economics, 1-15.
  • Schleritzko, M. (2023). Households’ Expectations of Returns on Gold. Available at SSRN 4398358.
  • Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., ve Lucey, B. (2019). Is Bitcoin a Better Safe-Haven Investment than Gold and Commodities? International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 322-330.
  • Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M., ve Mazzara, M. (2019). A PLS-SEM Neural Network Approach for Understanding Cryptocurrency Adoption. IEEE Access, 8, 13138-13150.
  • Symitsi, E., ve Chalvatzis, K. J. (2019). The Economic Value of Bitcoin: A Portfolio Analysis of Currencies, Gold, Oil and Stocks. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 97-110.
  • Şenkardeş, C. G., ve Akadur, O. (2021). A Research on the Factors Affecting Cryptocurrency Investments within the Gender Context. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 10(4), 178-189.
  • Tuna, G., ve Tuna, V. E. (2022). Are Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Markets Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from Gold, Oil and Stock Markets. Resources Policy, 76, 102637.
  • Wen, F., Tong, X., ve Ren, X. (2022). Gold or Bitcoin, Which is the Safe Haven During the COVID-19 Pandemic?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102121.
  • West, T., ve Worthington, A. C. (2014). Macroeconomic Conditions and Australian Financial Risk Attitudes, 2001–2010. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35, 263-277.
  • Xi, D., O’Brien, T. I., ve Irannezhad, E. (2020). Investigating the Investment Behaviors in Cryptocurrency. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 23(2), 141-160.
  • Yakupoğlu, Y. A. ve Okur, M. (2021). A Study on Perception of Financial Market Professionals in Turkey towards Gold. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences , 20 (3), 1324-1337.
  • Yang, Y., Zhang, C., ve Yan, Y. (2019). Does Religious Faith Affect Household Financial Market Participation? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 83, 42-50.
  • Yeong, Y. C., Kalid, K. S., Savita, K. S., Ahmad, M. N., ve Zaffar, M. (2022). Sustainable Cryptocurrency Adoption Assessment among IT Enthusiasts and Cryptocurrency Social Communities. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102085.
  • Yıldırım, Z. ve Üçdoğruk Birecikli, Ş., (2021), Dilim Regresyon Yöntemiyle Türkiye'de Hanehalkı Tasarruf Eğilimi Araştırması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 35(2), 523-550
  • Zahirović, S., ve Okičić, J. (2016). Effects of Risk Aversion on Securities Portfolio Performance in Underdeveloped Capital Markets: The Case of the Capital Market of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 343-359.
  • Zengin, S., Yüksel, S., ve Kartal, M. T. (2018). Türkiye'deki Düşük Hanehalkı Tasarrufuna Neden Olan Faktörlerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 13(49), 86-100.
  • Zhang, A. C., Fang, J., Jacobsen, B., ve Marshall, B. R. (2018). Peer Effects, Personal Characteristics and Asset Allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 76-95.
  • Zhang, S., ve Mani, G. (2021). Popular cryptoassets (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin), Gold, and Their Relationships: Volatility and Correlation Modeling. Data Science and Management, 4, 30-39.
There are 90 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Finance
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Behice Canatan 0000-0001-9588-386X

Gökhan Özbilge 0000-0002-9060-091X

Egemen İpek 0000-0002-1365-0526

Publication Date May 5, 2024
Submission Date January 8, 2024
Acceptance Date February 28, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Issue: 43

Cite

APA Canatan, B., Özbilge, G., & İpek, E. (2024). HANEHALKI FİNANSAL VARLIK SEÇİMİNİN SOSYAL BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi(43), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1416671

______________________________________________________

Address: Karadeniz Technical University Department of Economics Room Number 213  

61080 Trabzon / Turkey

e-mail : uiiidergisi@gmail.com